Pisqa’ 1211
1
“And should he say to you: I will not go free from you” (Dt.15:16).
Is it possible to say that
[if the Hebrew slave refused his freedom] once,
he undergoes the piercing of his ear?
The Teaching states:
“Now, if the slave forcefully declares” (Ex.21:5)—
he cannot be permanently enslaved
until he declares and repeats
[his insistence upon remaining enslaved].2
If he declared [his desire to remain enslaved]
during the six years [of his term of service],
but did not declare it at the end of the six years
when he is entitled to go free—
indeed, he is not to be pierced,
for it says:
“I will not be set free” (Ex.21:5)—
he cannot be permanently enslaved
unless he insists upon it at the time of liberation,
[after six complete years].
If he declared at the end of the six years,
but he hadn’t declared during the six years—
indeed, he is not to be pierced,
for it is said:
“If the slave forcefully declares” (Dt.21:5)—
he cannot be permanently enslaved
unless he declares his insistence
while time remains in the term of his servitude.
2
“For he loves you” (Dt.15:16)—
inferring from what is stated elsewhere:
“I love my master” (Ex.21:5)—
{wouldn’t I already know that
he loves his master?
In fact,}3 on the basis of both verses,
you can claim:
if he loved his master,
but his master doesn’t love him;
or if he is beloved to his master,
but he doesn’t love his master—
indeed, he is not to be pierced!
As it is said:
“For he loves you” (Dt.15:16)—
[the essential element is the slave’s love for the master].
If the Hebrew slave has a wife and children,
yet his master has no wife or children,
he is not to be pierced,
for it is said:
“For he loves you and your household” (Dt.15:16)—
[implying that the master has a family of his own].4
“Since all is well with him among you” (Dt.15:16)—
thus, if he or his master become ill,
indeed, he is not to be pierced.